We have seen the newly-consecrated Bishop Eugene\u2019s understanding of the dignity of the episcopacy as successors of the apostles \u2013 which gave a particular relationship between priests and bishops, and between bishops themselves. He refers to this in his response to Bishop Arbaud\u2019s complaints about the Oblates at ND du Laus.<\/p>\n
\nWill it be said that two Bishops do not agree when it is a matter of the Church\u2019s interests, the honor of the priesthood and the rights of justice and fairness? If I knew that one of our men was in the wrong, I don\u2019t say in the respect and submission that is your due, but even in the esteem only that your dignity and virtues require, I would not have words strong enough to condemn him, and I would be ready to demand that he make all the amends that you would require.<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The Oblates had not been disrespectful of the Bishop, and their conduct had been irreproachable.<\/p>\n
\nThanks be to God, however, there is no question of that, and in the annoyance that your correspondence gives me, I have the consolation of finding in it the assurance that you are satisfied with everyone\u2019s conduct.<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The problem was that someone had complained that the Oblates were too lenient with penitents in the confessional<\/p>\n
\nIt all comes down to a few vague allegations, evidently exaggerated, that some secret enemy communicated to you.<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Letter to Bishop Arbaud of Gap, 20 February 1833, EO XIII n 81<\/p>\n
A diplomatic way of getting his point across while calming the waters!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
We have seen the newly-consecrated Bishop Eugene\u2019s understanding of the dignity of the episcopacy as successors of the apostles \u2013 which gave a particular relationship between priests and bishops, and between bishops themselves. He refers to this in his response … Continue reading